AiVisible

AiVisible methodology

How we measure brand presence in AI-generated answers.

We publish definitions, sample-design rules and limitations so results can be interpreted and cited responsibly.

The method is versioned. Every published change has a date and description.

Method flow

From buying situation to finding

1Buyer research
2Question set
3Model answers
4Coding
5Aggregation
6Interpretation and limitations

A result always relates to a defined sample, models, market and date.

Definitions

A metric only makes sense with its denominator and sample.

Mention

The brand or product name appears in the answer.

Recommendation

The answer presents the brand as an appropriate option for the question.

Citation

The answer names a source connected to the information.

Recommendation rate

The share of answers meeting the recommendation definition within a sample.

Question set

Questions come from buying situations, not a random keyword list.

option discovery
shortlisting
comparison
use case
budget
trust

Limitations

Every result is published with its limitations.

answers are variable
models and sources change
conversation context may affect the result
presence does not prove sales impact
comparison requires a stable sample core

Citing results

When citing a result, include the category, sample, models and date.

Important:We do not treat one answer as evidence of a brand's position across an entire category.

Sample design

The question set represents decision stages, not keyword volume.

Intent map

Coverage across the buying decision

Active system structure
1Option discovery

Which solutions are worth considering?

category · alternatives
2Shortlist building

Which provider or product fits this use case?

segment · specialisation
3Comparison

Option A or B against these criteria?

differences · limitations
4Fit

What works at this scale and budget?

use case · budget
5Trust

Which option has the right experience?

evidence · sources
The question set should cover the complete buying journey. A list of popular phrases alone cannot show where a brand disappears from the decision.

Discovery

Questions about available options, categories and ways to solve a problem.

Shortlist

Questions narrowing selection by segment, industry, use case and risk.

Comparison

Questions about differences, alternatives, limits, budget and fit.

Trust

Questions about experience, credibility, sources and selection conditions.

Coding

We separate mentions, recommendations, citations and reasons for selection.

whether the brand appears
whether it is presented as an appropriate option
which need it is matched to
which arguments support the selection
whether sources are cited
how results differ by cohort and model

Comparing waves

Change only matters when comparison conditions are preserved.

The control core remains stable and exploratory questions are marked separately. Changes to models, scope or coding must be documented before interpreting differences.

Wave comparison

Baseline, publication and follow-up measurement

Active system structure
T0

Baseline

  • control question core
  • models and date
  • full answers
Log

Implementation log

  • asset and owner
  • publication date
  • scope of change
T1

Follow-up wave

  • the same core
  • the same definitions
  • description of the difference
Exploratory questions are labelled separately
Model changes are recorded as limitations
No difference is also a result
stable sample core
question-set version
model list and dates
consistent metric definitions
new questions documented separately
full answers available for audit

Next step

See how the method works in your category.

We first determine whether a useful, comparable sample can be built.

Assess your category

FAQ

Questions before you decide

Is the number of prompts the most important factor?

No. Coverage of buying situations, a clear denominator, consistent definitions and repeatability matter more.

Why can results change?

Models, sources and answer generation evolve. The question, date, context and sample scope also affect results.

Does recommendation rate represent sales share?

No. It measures observed recommendations in a defined sample. Connecting it to business outcomes requires client data and separate analysis.

Can AiVisible results be cited?

Yes, when the category, sample, models, date and relevant limitations accompany the result.