Mention
The brand or product name appears in the answer.
AiVisible methodology
We publish definitions, sample-design rules and limitations so results can be interpreted and cited responsibly.
The method is versioned. Every published change has a date and description.
Method flow
From buying situation to finding
A result always relates to a defined sample, models, market and date.
Definitions
The brand or product name appears in the answer.
The answer presents the brand as an appropriate option for the question.
The answer names a source connected to the information.
The share of answers meeting the recommendation definition within a sample.
Question set
Limitations
Citing results
Sample design
Intent map
Coverage across the buying decision
Which solutions are worth considering?
Which provider or product fits this use case?
Option A or B against these criteria?
What works at this scale and budget?
Which option has the right experience?
Questions about available options, categories and ways to solve a problem.
Questions narrowing selection by segment, industry, use case and risk.
Questions about differences, alternatives, limits, budget and fit.
Questions about experience, credibility, sources and selection conditions.
Coding
Comparing waves
The control core remains stable and exploratory questions are marked separately. Changes to models, scope or coding must be documented before interpreting differences.
Wave comparison
Baseline, publication and follow-up measurement
Next step
We first determine whether a useful, comparable sample can be built.
FAQ
No. Coverage of buying situations, a clear denominator, consistent definitions and repeatability matter more.
Models, sources and answer generation evolve. The question, date, context and sample scope also affect results.
No. It measures observed recommendations in a defined sample. Connecting it to business outcomes requires client data and separate analysis.
Yes, when the category, sample, models, date and relevant limitations accompany the result.
Related resources